QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMATIC LITERATURES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

OKesola, J. O. and Okokpujie, K. O. and Adebiyi, A. A. and Ayo, C. K. (2018) QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT OF SYSTEMATIC LITERATURES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 96 (18). pp. 6018-6026. ISSN 1992-8645; 1817-3195

Text 2Vol96No18.pdf - Published Version Download (252kB)

Abstract

Several systematic literature reviews (SLRs) have been published on many aspects of Software engineering (SE) in the last two decades. However, researchers are yet to evaluate the quality of those studies in order to determine the reliability of their findings. This work employed SLR method and performed automated search of studies published between 2012 and 2017 aiming at evaluating the quality of the recent SLRs published in SE. This paper adapted Dybå and Dingsøyr quality criteria using dichotomous scale of grading to assess the quality of the primary studies in SLRs. A total of 15 of 53 primary studies have suitable recruitment strategy for their research aims, and 19 mentioned the control group (s) with wish their methods were com-pared. All the 53 papers passed all the standard quality conditions. The quality of the SLRs are high with only very small percentage failing in three out of 11 quality criteria. The research methodologies applied in their primary studies are comprehensive and were based on clear description of the context, thereby making their findings valid and reliable. The current SLRs in SE are of good quality but adequate consideration should be given to the relationship between the researchers and the participants.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Computer software
Depositing User:	Mr DIGITAL CONTENT CREATOR LMU
Date Deposited:	24 Apr 2019 08:43
Last Modified:	24 Apr 2019 08:43
URI:	https://eprints.lmu.edu.ng/id/eprint/2110

Actions (login required)

View Item